<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Advantages of Short URLs and Redirects</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.klikdeal.com/blog/2009/09/advantages-of-short-urls-and-redirects/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.klikdeal.com/blog/2009/09/advantages-of-short-urls-and-redirects/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 06:13:57 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kaushik</title>
		<link>http://www.klikdeal.com/blog/2009/09/advantages-of-short-urls-and-redirects/comment-page-1/#comment-343</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaushik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 09:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.klikdeal.com/blog/?p=175#comment-343</guid>
		<description>ShortURLs are one of the worst things to happen on the Internet. I don&#039;t understand why people keep using, unless they have to post on Twitter. But Twitter came just yesterday, and shorturls were in use long before Twitter.

sURLs take link juice away from where it&#039;s due. Also the link becomes dependent on the sURL. They are just bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ShortURLs are one of the worst things to happen on the Internet. I don&#8217;t understand why people keep using, unless they have to post on Twitter. But Twitter came just yesterday, and shorturls were in use long before Twitter.</p>
<p>sURLs take link juice away from where it&#8217;s due. Also the link becomes dependent on the sURL. They are just bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
